ad space

I am confused. The purpose of a CableCard reader is to allow people to record high definition television. In theory, if I have a CableCard reader, I do not need a cable box. So why would I want an external CableCard reader that attaches to my computer? Let me get this straight: to replace my cable box, I need a computer and then this hideous device called an external Digital Tuner from ATI. To replace one device that sits by my television, I need two new devices. That is brilliant! I love progress.

The thing that frustrates me even more is that this external tuner is only for one CableCard, meaning you cannot watch one show and record another.  If you want to do that, you need a second tuner.  That is some serious clutter around my television.

ati-dct-hands-on-2.jpg

del.icio.us | Digg it | reddit | StumbleUpon |

Enjoyed the post? Subscribe to the full feed for daily updates.

Related Posts on Floppyhead.com:

  • Dell Ships XPS 410 With Digital Cable Tuners
  • Niveus Digital Cable Receiver insanely expensive
  • How CableLabs will certify Vista’s Media Center for HDTV
  • Where Are the Set Top Boxes with CableCard?
  • 4 Responses to “This CableCard reader is uglier than my cable box!”

    1. on 04 Feb 2007 at 10:10 pm Patrick

      There are also internal DCTs, although they also connect via USB (go figure), and I believe Vista MC supports up to 2 of them. You’re right though, these external DCTs are hideous!

    2. on 06 Mar 2007 at 5:17 pm Mark Ross

      If your tv doens’t have a cable card slot then you have to get a cable box, these have a monthly fee in my area at $8-12/month depending on if you have dvr etc. However, cable cards are free so with this box you have no additional monthly fees!

    3. on 08 Mar 2007 at 9:57 pm Anonymous

      Cablecards usually are not free but they do cost less per month than a cable box.

    4. [...] read more | digg story [...]

    Trackback URI | Comments RSS

    Leave a Reply